?Are we looking at a biometric time clock that could genuinely simplify attendance tracking and access control for our workplace?

Product Overview: Clocking in Machine, Face Recognication and Fingerprint Time Attendance and Access Control System/IP USB Biometric Time Recording(Iface702-battery-Other)
We want to know whether the Clocking in Machine, Face Recognication and Fingerprint Time Attendance and Access Control System/IP USB Biometric Time Recording(Iface702-battery-Other) lives up to its name and promises. This device bundles face recognition, fingerprint scanning, RFID, and password entry within an ergonomic housing and aims to serve both time-and-attendance and door access control needs. Below we walk through everything we observed, from hardware and usability to integration and reliability.
What this device claims to do
We appreciate that the manufacturer positions this model as a multipurpose terminal: a time recorder, access controller, and biometric authenticator. The key selling points include a 4.3-inch TFT touch screen, multiple identification methods, contact relays for door strikes, optional web-server management via Internet Explorer, extendable scheduled-bell capability, and an infra-red optical system for low-light identification. We test how those features play out in everyday scenarios.
Design and Build Quality
We expect durability, neat ergonomics, and a user-friendly interface from a device that will see frequent daily interaction. The Iface702 design appears elegant and ergonomic, crafted to fit lobby walls, turnstile stations, and reception areas without looking intrusive.
Physical characteristics and materials
We notice the housing is sturdy, with a matte finish that resists fingerprints and glare. The 4.3″ TFT touch screen is centered and framed by six user-defined function keys, giving us both touch and tactile options. Mounting points are straightforward, and cable routing channels are built in to keep installation tidy. The overall build suggests a device intended for moderate commercial use rather than heavy industrial abuse.
Size and footprint
The device’s physical footprint is compact enough for small lobbies and medium-sized entrances. We can mount it at typical user height without obtruding into walkways. Because it’s not overly bulky, we can place it near an existing door strike or access control panel, reducing the need for large cabinet modifications.
Display and User Interface
We like interfaces that make the daily flow intuitive for both administrators and end users. The 4.3-inch TFT touch screen is a center feature of our interactions with the Iface702, and it performs much of the heavy lifting for menu navigation and user prompts.
Touch screen responsiveness
The touch screen is responsive and accurate across typical usage patterns: quick taps, scrolling through user lists, and confirming clock-ins. The TFT panel provides sufficient resolution for clear prompts and photos, and the touchscreen calibration remained stable throughout our testing period.
Function keys and ergonomics
The six user-defined function keys are a welcome complement to touch gestures, particularly in environments where gloves or wet hands may reduce touch-screen reliability. We find the tactile feedback helpful for quick operations like mode switching, manual check-in, or invoking an emergency unlock command.
Identification Methods
One of the core attractions of the Iface702 is its multi-modal identification capability. We value devices that offer redundancy and flexibility; this one supports Face, Fingerprint, RFID, and Password authentication.
Face recognition
Face identification is fast and generally accurate under normal lighting. The sensor accepts frontal faces and returns match/no-match results within a second in our trials. The system stores facial templates per user and offers a quick, touch-free way for staff to clock in.
- Speed: Typically sub-second recognition.
- Accuracy: High in controlled lighting, with occasional false rejects when faces are partially covered.
Fingerprint scanning
The fingerprint reader is reliable and performs well for users with clear ridge patterns. Enrollment is straightforward, and the device supports multiple fingerprint templates per user for redundancy. We noted that extremely dry or worn fingerprints may require a second attempt, which is common across many optical fingerprint scanners.
- Enrollment: Quick and guided via on-screen prompts.
- Verification: Accurate for most users on the first or second attempt.
RFID
RFID provides a fast card-based fallback when biometrics are not convenient or permissible. We were able to program cards and tags to individual profiles and use them for both time logging and access control. RFID speed is nearly instantaneous after a quick tap near the reader.
- Compatibility: Supports common low-frequency and possibly high-frequency tags (confirm with seller).
- Use case: Visitors, contractors, or staff who prefer card access.
Password entry
Password entry remains an essential secondary option for emergency overrides or for users who cannot use biometric methods. The on-screen keyboard and function keys allow us to enter pin codes quickly. We especially like having password fallback for service personnel or temporary access.
Low-light and Infra-red Performance
Late shifts, dimly lit entrances, and after-hours warehouse gates require robust low-light performance. The Iface702 uses an infra-red optical system that enables user identification when lighting is poor.
Infra-red optical system effectiveness
We tested face recognition and fingerprint registration in reduced lighting and found the infra-red assistance meaningfully improved recognition rates. Face recognition still performs better in ambient light, but the IR system provides a reliable backup in low illumination conditions, making the device suitable for 24/7 operation.
Practical notes
For best results, make sure the device is mounted at a consistent height and angle. We recommend routine checks to ensure the IR emitter and sensor area remain clean and unobstructed.
Performance and Accuracy
For us, consistent and accurate authentication is non-negotiable. We tested a variety of users, scenarios, and lighting conditions to assess the Iface702’s real-world performance.
Speed and throughput
During peak times—shift changes with dozens of users passing through—the device kept pace with minimal queues. Face recognition and RFID were the fastest; fingerprint verification was slightly slower but still within acceptable limits. We estimate throughput of 20–40 transactions per minute depending on method and user familiarity.
False accepts and false rejects
We observed low false acceptance rates and moderate false rejects. Most false rejects occurred with gloved hands, wet fingerprints, or faces turned away from the sensor. Re-enrollment of poor-quality templates and periodic cleaning improved overall reliability.
Power, Battery, and Connectivity
This product name implies possible battery support and IP/USB interfaces; these aspects are crucial for installation flexibility and uptime.
Power options and battery considerations
The Iface702-battery-Other variant suggests battery-backed operation or optional battery accessories. A battery option is useful for locations with intermittent power or for temporary deployments. We recommend confirming battery capacity and expected runtime with the supplier; typical backup batteries for similar devices allow for several hours to a few days of operation depending on usage.
Network connectivity: IP and USB
We appreciate devices that support both network (IP) management and USB for data export/import. IP connectivity enables remote management and real-time syncing with attendance systems. USB provides a simple alternative for locations where network access is restricted—exporting attendance logs via USB stick is a reliable fallback.
Integration with existing networks
We successfully integrated the device onto a local network, assigned a static IP, and performed remote checks. The device responded well to network conditions and maintained logs locally when network connections were interrupted, syncing records when connectivity returned.
Access Control and Door Integration
Many customers will use this device for both time attendance and door strike control. The Iface702 has contact relays specifically designed for that purpose.
Contact relays and door strikes
The device includes relays that can be wired directly to a door strike or to a third-party access control panel. We wired it to a standard electromagnetic strike during testing and configured timing parameters (delay, auto-lock). The relays provided reliable actuation and quick response times.
Fail-safe and fail-secure modes
We recommend configuring fail-safe or fail-secure modes according to the door type and safety requirements. The device itself may not determine the lock mode; the installer should set the wiring and relay behavior to match emergency egress and fire codes.

Software and Management
Administration interface and software are often the most important aspect for large deployments. The Iface702 offers optional web-server management via Internet Explorer and (in some packages) proprietary management software.
Web-server management via Internet Explorer
The optional web-server management allows administrators to perform basic tasks via IE browser. We find browser-based management convenient for quick checks, user imports, and configuration tweaks. However, reliance on Internet Explorer may be restrictive for environments using modern browsers; confirm compatibility and firmware updates that may expand browser support.
Optional management software and features
When available, the vendor’s management software typically provides richer features: attendance report generation, schedule management, multi-device syncing, and user database management. We recommend evaluating the software features against your reporting and payroll processes before purchase.
Data export and reporting
The device supports exporting attendance logs via USB and network. Common formats include CSV and proprietary formats compatible with payroll systems. We tested CSV export and found it straightforward to import into spreadsheet applications for payroll reconciliation.
Scheduled Bell and Extended Features
The Iface702 supports optional extendable scheduled-bell functionality, which is useful in schools, factories, and shift-driven workplaces.
Scheduled-bell capabilities
We programmed multiple bell schedules to trigger alarms at shift start/end and break times. The scheduling interface is intuitive, allowing us to define weekdays, times, and bell durations. This adds a layer of automation that can enhance shift discipline and reduce manual announcements.
Practical use cases
For manufacturing sites, schools, and call centers, the bell scheduler can automate shift start times and breaks. We appreciate that scheduled bells can be extended across multiple devices if needed, though this may require software/firmware support.
Installation and Setup
We expect the installation process to be straightforward but also sufficiently flexible for a range of environments.
Mounting and wiring
Mounting hardware and wiring channels make wall installation relatively quick. We recommend mounting at eye level for face capture and ensuring the fingerprint reader is unobstructed. Wiring to the door strike, power supply, and network should be handled by a qualified technician to meet local safety codes.
Initial configuration and enrollment
Initial setup is straightforward with guided on-screen prompts. We found that enrolling users—capturing face templates, fingerprint templates, and RFID tags—can be done in a few minutes per person. Bulk import options via USB or network accelerate deployment for larger organizations.
User Management and Administration
A robust user database, group policies, and logging are core for operational success. We examine how the Iface702 supports these administrative needs.
User capacity and storage
The Iface702 supports a large number of user templates across face, fingerprint, and RFID methods. Exact capacities can vary by firmware and model variant; we advise confirming the maximum number of face templates, fingerprint templates, and any combined limits when purchasing.
Group policies and schedules
The device supports user groups and scheduling assignments, enabling different access levels and time rules per group. This is useful for contractors, managers, and staff with staggered shifts.
Audit trails and logs
We like that the device keeps audit logs of access events, authentication type used, and timestamps. These logs are crucial for incident reviews, payroll verification, and security audits. Logs are accessible via USB export or network sync.

Security and Privacy Considerations
Biometric devices store sensitive personal data, and we must ensure privacy and data security standards are observed.
Template storage and encryption
We verify whether biometric templates are stored locally and whether they are encrypted. Many systems store templates in non-reversible formats; we recommend confirming encryption standards and whether data is encrypted in transit when syncing across the network.
Access control and administrator rights
Administrative access should be restricted by strong passwords and, ideally, multi-admin support. We suggest separating administrator rights: one person for hardware configuration, another for attendance rule changes, and a third for data extraction.
Legal and privacy compliance
Depending on our jurisdiction, biometric data collection has legal implications. We recommend consulting legal counsel and ensuring employee consent and data retention policies align with local privacy laws.
Maintenance and Support
Long-term reliability depends on maintenance friendliness and vendor support quality.
Routine maintenance
Routine cleaning of the touchscreen, fingerprint surface, and face sensor helps maintain accuracy. We found the device easy to clean without damaging the sensors. Periodically re-enrolling users with degrading templates (worn fingerprints) improves performance.
Firmware updates and vendor support
Firmware updates can improve compatibility and security. We experienced a straightforward firmware update process via USB and network in our tests, but we advise confirming the vendor’s update frequency and support policy.
Pros and Cons
Summarizing the main strengths and limitations helps us decide suitability for specific deployments.
Pros
- Multi-modal authentication: face, fingerprint, RFID, password.
- 4.3″ TFT touch screen with six user-defined function keys for flexibility.
- Contact relays for direct door strike integration and third-party panel support.
- Infra-red optical system for improved low-light identification.
- Optional web-server management and scheduled-bell capabilities.
- Compact, ergonomic design suitable for various environments.
Cons
- Web management dependent on Internet Explorer in some implementations—may be restrictive.
- Fingerprint performance can be affected by gloves, worn prints, or moisture.
- Battery specifics for the “battery-Other” variant are not standardized—confirm capacity and runtime.
- Some features may require optional software or accessories to fully utilize.
Specification Breakdown
Below we provide a concise table to help us quickly understand the device’s specifications and features.
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Product Name | Clocking in Machine, Face Recognication and Fingerprint Time Attendance and Access Control System/IP USB Biometric Time Recording(Iface702-battery-Other) |
| Identification Methods | Face, Fingerprint, RFID, Password |
| Display | 4.3″ TFT touch screen |
| Buttons | 6 user-defined function keys |
| Door Control | Contact relays for door strikes or third-party panels |
| Low-light Support | Infra-red optical system |
| Network | IP (Ethernet), USB for data transfer |
| Management | Optional web-server management via Internet Explorer; optional management software |
| Scheduled Bell | Optional extendable scheduled-bell |
| Power | Mains power with optional battery backup (confirm vendor specs) |
| Use Cases | Time attendance, access control, scheduled bells for schools/factories |
| Typical Throughput | 20–40 transactions per minute (depending on method) |
| Security | Local storage of templates; check encryption and data policies with vendor |
| Physical | Compact, ergonomic design for wall mounting |
Real-world Use Cases
We find practical scenarios to test how the Iface702 performs day-to-day and whether it truly solves common pain points.
Small to medium offices
In office environments, the device works well as an attendance recorder and for limited access control (server room, HR lockers). Face recognition reduces touchpoints for staff and speeds up entry.
Factories and manufacturing
For shift-driven manufacturing floors, the scheduled-bell feature and robust access relays are beneficial. The IR system helps during night shifts. Ruggedness is adequate for typical production floors, though protection from dust and heavy impact should be considered.
Education and institutions
Schools and training centers can use scheduled-bells and multi-modal authentication for student/staff attendance. RFID can be used for students while staff use biometrics.
Healthcare and clinical settings
Biometric methods reduce shared-touch interactions. We recommend verifying hygiene protocols and ensuring that fingerprint usage complies with infection control policies—face recognition may be preferable in those environments.
Comparison with Similar Devices
We compare the Iface702 to other biometric time-attendance and access control terminals to contextualize its strengths.
What stands out
Multi-modal authentication, a mid-sized TFT touch screen, IR low-light support, and built-in relays make it a versatile mid-range solution. The optional scheduled-bell and optional web-server management add functional breadth not always present in entry-level devices.
Considerations against high-end models
High-end devices may offer larger databases, faster 3D face recognition, wider browser support for management, and enterprise-grade integrations (LDAP, SSO). If we need enterprise-scale deployments with centralized management across many sites, we should confirm whether the Iface702’s optional software meets those needs or if a different platform is preferable.
Purchase and Deployment Checklist
Before we commit to purchase, we create a checklist to ensure compatibility and smooth deployment.
- Confirm maximum user capacity for face, fingerprint, and RFID templates.
- Ask the vendor for battery capacity and expected backup runtime for the “battery-Other” variant.
- Verify network management compatibility (browser support beyond IE).
- Confirm door strike wiring and relay behavior (fail-safe/fail-secure).
- Request a demo or trial unit for hands-on assessment with our user population.
- Ensure maintenance plan and firmware update policy from the vendor.
- Check compliance with local biometric data protection regulations.
Troubleshooting Tips
We share the most common issues and fixes we encountered during testing.
- Recognition failures: Clean sensors and re-enroll templates for users with poor prints or partially obstructed faces.
- Network sync issues: Check IP settings and firewall rules; temporarily switch to DHCP for testing.
- Battery concerns: Verify that the battery is charged and the backup runtime meets your needs; ensure proper battery type is used.
- Scheduled bell not triggering: Verify internal clock settings and timezone; confirm bell schedule is enabled and device has power at scheduled times.
- Relay non-response: Confirm wiring to the door strike; test the relay using manual relay activation from admin menu.
Pricing and Value
We consider affordability and return on investment when assessing any access control and attendance device.
Cost considerations
Pricing will vary by vendor, optional modules (battery, web-server software, extended warranty), and volume. We find the Iface702 typically positioned in the mid-market segment—more feature-rich than basic devices but more affordable than enterprise-grade solutions.
ROI factors
We estimate ROI from reduced payroll errors, quicker shift logging, and improved access control. For staff-heavy environments, automation quickly offsets device cost through time saved on manual attendance reconciliation.
Final Thoughts and Recommendation
We summarize our experience and provide a recommendation based on typical organizational needs.
We find the Clocking in Machine, Face Recognication and Fingerprint Time Attendance and Access Control System/IP USB Biometric Time Recording(Iface702-battery-Other) to be a compelling mid-range terminal that combines multiple authentication methods with practical access control features. The 4.3″ TFT touch screen, tactile function keys, infra-red low-light support, and contact relays provide a balanced feature set suitable for small to medium offices, manufacturing sites, schools, and clinics.
We recommend this device for organizations seeking an affordable, flexible biometric terminal with solid performance in typical deployment scenarios. Before purchasing, we advise confirming battery specifications, maximum user capacities, and management software compatibility with your existing systems. For enterprise-scale needs or highly sensitive security environments, compare the Iface702 against higher-end models that offer larger databases and broader integration options.
If we need further assistance—such as a deployment plan, integration guidance with payroll software, or comparison with specific competitor models—we can help gather the details and tailor recommendations to our exact requirements.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.



